Monday, September 29, 2014

Front Door: What Color?

So the siding is up at Wise Road and we have chosen a paint color (Benjamin Moore's Swiss Coffee). I will post pictures as soon as it is painted. Meanwhile, the finances are a bit tighter than expected due to inevitable unexpecteds, so some less essential projects have been put on the back burner. We were planning to buy a new (old) door from our local architectural salvage, but we have decided to wait on this. The current door is new but cheep and unappealing. However, it will serve for a while. Since this door is only temporary I have leave to choose any paint color I want!

Here are some of my ideas.

1. Brilliant Blue. You see this color all the time in the UK. I love it. I've always sworn that I'll have a door like this some day. It looks so lovely with the ancient stone, yes? However, I'm not sure it will look as good with white clapboard. ???

blue front door

2. Or there is Pale Blue.

A pale blue paint with gold accents freshens any front door. Topiaries add color.

3. And Smokey Sagey Blue like this classic Farrow and Ball color:

soft sage door, for that chic country house

4. Or how about going toward the greener side of sage? (Fantastic wisteria included, of course.)



5. Or if we like green how about this?

green doors | 15 Green Front Door Designs That Inspire » Photo 4

6. And if we are thinking bright, what about classic Red?

red-front-door.jpg (500×750)

7. Or less classic Yellow!

Transitional Entry by LDa Architecture & Interiors

8. Though sometimes I find myself going in the opposite direction--towards monotone White on White.

white clapboard...by the beach. #classicamericanhomes

9. Or this white, which is just Off White, White Towards Sage?

Exterior Masonry - Choosing Paint Finishes with Farrow & Ball  White front door, white house

10. And then, to appease the four-year-old girls in the family, here are a few selections of Pink doors (which I must admit I like more than I thought I would!)

Luscious pink front door white house blossom - mylusciouslifeblush & pink front doors

Any thoughts?

My conclusion after writing this post is that ANY color looks good if you add a historic home in England and some antique brass fittings. And a topiary. Don't forget the topiary.


Saturday, September 27, 2014

Housekeeping for the Housewife?



There’s a sweet little poem that periodically makes the rounds on Facebook—usually when a fresh crop of babies arrive. You’ve probably read it, maybe you have even posted it? It goes like this:

     Where is the mother whose house is so shocking?
     She’s up in the nursery, blissfully rocking.

     The cleaning and scrubbing can wait till tomorrow,
     But children grow up, as I’ve learned to my sorrow.
     So quiet down cobwebs; dust go to sleep!
     I’m rocking my baby and babies don’t keep.

I have read this time and time again, and always I nod my head. Yes, I say, how true--that a baby is for a moment, a precious moment, and then she is no longer a baby. She is a child, then an adult. Then she is gone. You will never hold her under your chin again. If you miss this moment now, you will miss it forever. How, in the face of this awesome and heartrending truth can I justify putting her down to—vacuum, dust, scour, cook, etc. etc.

This sentiment was echoed recently when Pope Francis encouraged parents to “waste time” with our children. Forget, for a moment, the to-do list, the “musts” and “shoulds.” Take a moment to gaze into your child’s eyes. To answer the 557th question. To read a story. To run through a sprinkler. “Waste” time with your children—or rather spend time with them, even when no measurable result is achieved. This is, of course, the “better part” that Mary chose when Martha was so busy doing…housework.


But—

But—

But—I have noticed something troubling. I have noticed that, in my own life, I frequently use this very argument to justify my (dare I say it?) laziness in regards to housekeeping. Going back to our little poem. It seems to me that the sentiment contained within its lines has at least a hint of this idea: “I am an enlightened, modern woman. And though I might embrace the noble title of Mother, I absolutely reject the identity of Housewife. Mothering is a noble pursuit. Housework is—not. Not valuable, not empowering.”

Housework, we say to ourselves, might be necessary--but then again, it might not be necessary. We can, after all, live with dust-bunnies! We might even begin to feel a certain affection for dust-bunnies—especially if we consider them tangible proof that *we* are good mothers who truly love our children—unlike those other women who ignore their baby and (gasp!) get out the vacuum.

There are days when I ignore the housework. On these days I like to quote our little poem to myself. “I’m spending time with my precious babies,” I tell myself “I don’t have time to dust. Or do laundry.” But—in reality—more often than not I am *not* spending quality time with my children. More often than not I am online.

And what am I doing online? And this is the funny part. I am usually on home-design blogs. And I find this highly ironic.  

Because, even if I don’t want to do laundry/dust/sweep/cook/etc.  I *do* want—desperately--to create for my family a warm, beautiful, welcoming home. So I sit in my cluttered, dusty rooms staring at a screen, searching, searching—for the perfect toy (handmade, aesthetically pleasing, developmentally appropriate), or the right rug/chair/wallpaper… in order to make my house feel like home. And what’s funny is that I am ignoring my children AND my home in order to BUY STUFF. And this is, to put it mildly, not right.

Because more stuff won't make me feel more at home—obviously, right? But it is not so obvious to me, on those Pinterest days, on those DesignSponge days, on those Apartment Therapy days.

Count on the immortal Cheryl Mendelson to speak some sense into the situation: 

“It is not in goods that the contemporary household is poor,” she writes, “but in comfort and care.” 

Yes! That’s what I want—“comfort and care!” And again: 

“Many people lead deprived lives in houses filled with material luxury.”

Deprived lives! How can this be true?

Because order and beauty, comfort and care, calmness, peace and a sense of belonging are what we want, what comes to mind when we think of HOME. And we don’t get these things by purchasing more—things! But we *can* get these things, argues Mendelson, by practicing good housekeeping.

For “housekeeping creates cleanliness, order, regularity, beauty, the conditions for health and safety, and a good place to do and feel all the things you wish and need to do and feel in your home. …it is your housekeeping that makes your home alive, that turns it into a small society in its own right, a vital place with its own ways and rhythms, the place where you can be more yourself that you can be anywhere else.

This is a high claim for housekeeping! And if this statement is true then something about our little poem is radically untrue. For the poem seems to suggest that if we are paying proper attention to those we love then we will not be *able* to take care of our home. “Leave me alone, I’m rocking my baby.” We EITHER gaze into the perfect face our precious one OR—we vacuum.

I am NOT saying that—at certain times and seasons—standards in housekeeping won’t suffer. The weeks after the arrival of a new baby, times of illness and transition. When there are many small children in a home it is impossible to finish cleaning the house. But the rhythm, the consistency, matter. And the children learn—sooner that I would have thought possible—to value order and cleanliness. Already my daughter—just four years old—has begun to appreciate neatness and beauty. She “makes” her bed (almost) every day. She takes joy in setting the table—complete with freshly picked flowers in a vase. She understands something that many of us educated, liberated women have forgotten: that housekeeping is not demeaning. It is not menial, not the work of a slave or a drudge. It is a joy, a tangible, concrete way that we can bring beauty into the world, a way to show love for those in our care. My daughter is beginning to understand about her home what I once learned about my own mother and her home:

“Her affection was in the soft sofa cushions, clean linens, and good meals; her memory in well-stocked storeroom cabinets and the pantry; her intelligence in the order and healthfulness of her home; her good humor in its light and air. She lived her life not only through her own body but through the house as an extension of her body; part of her relation to those she loved was embodied in the physical medium of the home she made.” (Mendelson again.)

Good housekeeping does not take us away from our family, rather it allows us to care for them in a concrete and physical way, to speak love into their lives in a language they can understand.

So, an orderly and clean home is something to strive for. Keeping house is a valuable and worthy pursuit. Of course, I have small children, so what I strive for is not the immaculate clean, not the everything-shining-no-toys-on-the-floor-dinner-on-the-table-by-five-o’clock-in-high-heels-served-with-a-smile kind of clean. Rather I strive for what Auntie Leila calls “the reasonablyclean house.” (And she raised seven children, so her reasonably clean is, well…reasonable!)

A reasonably clean house is one where you enjoy spending time. One with bright rooms, fresh air, clean towels and sheets, and regular meals (and therefore a clean and cheerful place to prepare and serve them).

I think that, when it comes to housekeeping, many of us are paralyzed by perfectionism. We have in our mind this vision of the Perfectly Clean (we’ve been hanging out on design blogs, after all.) We have in our mind this vague idea that cleaning requires hours of solitude and focused energy. I remember that when I was pregnant with baby #2 I spent hours scheming and stressing out over how I would get both kids to nap at the same time so that I could clean, cook, and do laundry. It seemed impossible that I might attempt to do housework when both babies were not asleep or otherwise absent. I remember voicing my anxiety to a friend who had three three-and-unders at home. “Well,” she said, “if you want your house to be clean, clean it,” she said. "Like when the kids are around?? "

Um, yes.

But they might interrupt me!

Um, yes.

But they might be in the way!

Let them help.

But then—then—the house won’t be…perfectly clean!!

Um, no. It won’t be perfectly clean. But it will be reasonably clean!

So this is what I have been trying to do lately, with varying degrees of success. I just clean my house. And always with a little troop of helpers (see above). And you know what? I’m spending quality time with my kids—and my house is not (too) “shocking’ after all!



Friday, September 12, 2014

Back to School










The last post was a bit much, I know.  “It took you long enough to get around to it,” I hear you say. “You asked one little question and yet it took you a good 1300 words to establish one conclusion. Couldn't you have skipped all that stuff in the middle?“

And I apologize for this extended meditation. But people, I find, sometimes balk at Catholics who quote pat answers from the Baltimore Catechism, so I decided that it might be prudent, illuminating, possibly inspiring, to journey the road that leads up to the simple (and true) answer.

Also, I wanted to explore the idea of the relational identity of the human person, because I have a feeling that “relation” and “relationship” and finally “communion” will be the watchwords of this blog, and a vital preoccupation of my home education endeavor.

But let’s get to it, shall we?

What have we learned?

That the end of education is:

to equip the individual to fulfill her end, namely 
“to know, to love, and to serve God.”

But how does education accomplish this end? If education is the “act or process of imparting or acquiring…knowledge,” then what knowledge should be taught? What must be learned? As I muse on these questions three types or rough categories of knowledge seem to suggest themselves: 

1. what I will call the “useful” knowledge,

2. “liberal” knowledge and

3. holiness, or the “knowledge” of virtue.


“Useful” education I define as the imparting of knowledge necessary for survival. For survival—life, existence itself—is the basic good, upon which all other goods depend. The end of man might be “to know, to love, and to serve God,” but he cannot know, love or serve unless he first exists. So a child must be taught to survive, and to survive independently, survive in the society in which she was born. This aspect of education then includes first and foremost imparting to the child the knowledge necessary to acquire  food and shelter, and therefore includes the development of skills (professional, etc.) aimed to accomplish this goal. It also, I would argue, includes what we would call “socialization,” in that the child must learn to speak the language of her native place and function in its structure.

Useful knowledge is necessary in the most basic sense, as we all can agree, but just because it flows from necessity does not mean that it cannot aspire to beauty in its own right. Humans possess the ability to turn necessity into art: culinary art, architecture, and gardening, to name but a few. Animals are perfectly able to procure food and shelter their young, but only people can make a meal a work of art, only people can create a home which is also, in its union of function and form, a thing of beauty.

“Art is the signature of man,” Chesterton argues.

But this ability suggests a further type of knowledge, a knowledge that is not only useful, that points beyond mere survival, and is able to inform our daily and necessary toil. This is the knowledge of “the good, the true, and the beautiful;” the philosophers call it “liberal.


*NOTE: not technically knowledge in the sense that Newman uses it, but formation of heart and of will, it is the will working in cooperation with divine grace to use knowledge in service of God and man.

Tuesday, September 9, 2014

What Can a Four-year-old Do?



Four years ago today I went into labor, signed a contract on a house, watched an episode of Jeeves and Wooster (thank you Stephen Fry and Hugh Laurie), and then toodled over to the hospital to meet my first child. Harriet Paloma--I cannot believe you are Four. You are becoming a little lady, a good companion, an interesting conversationalist, an aid and support for your mother, a woman of character.



Remembering the first few weeks of your life, the first few weeks when I struggled to learn how to become a mother, I am in awe of who you are becoming. I am amazed at what you can do! You have reached the point where you are actually helpful! I told you so the other day. So we decided to compile a list in honor of the day: "Things Four-year-olds Can Do" ("all by myself," you added).

Things Four-Year-Olds Can Do (All By Myself)

1. Open the door for her mommy when her hands are full.
2. Listen to a chapter book.
3. Use the bathroom (almost) without help
4. Dress herself
5. Hold Mommy's coffee while she puts the baby in the car (so helpful!)
6. Obey Promptly
7. Set the Table
8. Keep the baby away from "choking hazards"


Sunday, September 7, 2014

House Update










There is progress on the house! Demolition is complete. All of the old (er, new) flooring has been removed and we can see the original tongue and groove which we will soon refinish. More importantly, the Cancerous Growth has been removed! We can now see the façade of the house as it was meant to be. Removal of said C.G. revealed the stone foundation, along with a corner-stone carved by hand with the initials of the original owner and the date, 1886. This is a later date than we were originally told, but after doing a bit of historical research we had begun to be suspicious of the veracity of the family lore handed down to us by the previous owner. Still, 1886 is old enough! And we were thrilled to uncover some history.

Anyway. Removing the addition has relieved the weird lopsided-ness of the house, but now we can see daylight through the wall where the kitchen will be. There was no salvageable siding under the plaster. So the front of the house must be sided pronto.

This has been a bit of an issue for us. We have opinions on siding. Our opinions being that wood, and only wood, is an acceptable material for siding a home. And real stone, and brick. I hate vinyl siding with a deep and abiding passion. However, we do not have the *ahem* resources to side the house with cedar lap at this time, and the house must be sided. So, we are going to use Smartside, which is a wood composite. I am terrified that I will hate it. And part of me feels like I have betrayed some deeply held principle. But there it is. It must be done. The siding goes up today.

Other than that: The new rooms are framed. We are plumbed. Devin will be putting in insulation in the next few weeks and then sheetrock!

We went up this weekend to “get some work done,” which really means mow. It was a pristine early September day (have I told you how much I love September?), but a frustrating trip because something is wrong with the mower. So Devin spent several unprofitable hours tinkering with the John Deere, while I hacked away at an old “flower” bed in preparation for a new perennial garden I hope to plant. I managed to save a bag full of iris tubers, but mainly succeeded in damaging my back as I hacked through a fierce web of mature weed roots. All in all I cleared out a little square about three feet by three feet. The bed runs for thirty feet along the road.


There is so much work to be done. It is so good for me. I am so tired.

LinkWithin

A